[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]

Re: [ferret_users] pyferret: FRAME output delay



Hi Karl,

Thank you for the detailed explanation!  It all makes sense.

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:56 AM Karl Smith - NOAA Affiliate <karl.smith@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

To answer your question in parentheses - yes, displayed windows are run as separate processes, due to Qt requirements.  All commands to draw, save, etc. are sent as commands to the displayed window process through a "pipe".  So once the command to save the image is put into the "pipe", the main PyFerret process continues on.  I can add code so the main PyFerret process waits for a reply from the displayed window process when saving an image.  (I need to add code to wait for a reply to support the Ferret "where" command.)

I would think that to wait would be a good thing to do.  Because we are talking about the interactive use of pyferret, the benefits of not waiting are probably marginal, but I'm not 100% sure.  Without the wait, you get the "yes?" prompt and can type the next command right away . . . is this a very useful property in practice?  If the answer is yes, we want to keep it.  In that case, perhaps the FRAME command needs a "WAIT" qualifier. . . .

On the other hand, this introduces an inconsistency: FRAME is executed in the background but all other commands are executed in the foreground (using the shell-programming terminology) . . . . 

Note that plots/windows that are not displayed (u
[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]