Re: [ferret_users] regarding vertical integrated moisture flux

Dear Satyesh,

Thank you for your profound email. But my query is still no resolved and I having confusion for the calculation of vertically integrated moisture flux and its divergence over the data levels of (1000, 925, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300). I have 3 results for divergence of vertically integrated moisture flux that I computed using NCEP and ERA-Interim and according to my understanding its unit is (kg/m^2/s) which is equivalent to (mm/day). Then I compared this computed result form ERA-Interim provided data for divergence of vertically integrated moisture flux and I found that my computed result is 2 order less than this.

I am attaching figures and my script for this computation. I am trying hard to understand why it is so but absolutely clueless about this.

regards, saurabh

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Satyesh Ghetiya <satyeshghetiya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Saurabh,

It looks okay to me, but it is very important to convince yourself what is going on in ferret. First look into https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/maillists/tmap/ferret_users/fu_2014/msg00216.html and then follow.

You try different limits for @din and check its calculations and ma m levels. Consider a variable named 'one' which has value 1 at these points till 7m, after which it has no value(...) at 13m grid point.

*****1***** 1
*****3***** 1
*****7***** 1
****13***** ......

So if you do " list one[k=@din] ", it will give:

1*(2-0)+1*(5-2)+1*(10-5)= 10

In this calculation, '2' is midpoint of 1 & 3. Subtract (3-'2') from 1 to get the previous midpoint, which is 1-1=0. so first box is 0 to 2. Then 5 is mid point of 3 & 7, so 2nd box becomes 2 to 5. Then midpoint of 7 & 13 is 10, so 3rd box is 5 to 10. So likewise even if we give one[z=1:3@din], result will be 10 which considers the next level (13 also) indirectly in calculation, but only the depth level, not the value at that level. Observe that 1 is multiplied with each box size, which is the value of the variable.

I hope this helps.

Regards,
G Satyesh,
India.

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:04 AM, saurabh rathore <rohitsrb2020@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Ferreters,

I am having a small doubt regarding vertical integration for the computation of vertical integrated moisture flux and the vertical axis is having pressure units.

This is the required formulation for this computation

Moisture flux = (

REGARDS

Saurabh Rathore

Research Scholar (PhD.)

Centre For Oceans, Rivers, Atmosphere & Land Science Technology

Indian Institute Of Technology, Kharagpur

contact :- 91- 8345984434